One of the subjects that is least dealt with in creative writing is violence. Women take it upon themselves to do so in Papua New Guinea through poetry and short stories because they see themselves as victims. The men might be too timid with the subject matter when it comes to self expression. And that is usually understandable if men believe in the slogan that actions speak louder than words.
But that attitude is rather blunt.
It is blunt because of the fact that we, as men, do not for a moment pause and consider how much time itself has changed us over an evolutionary span of some 7 or so million years. At least the scientist among us would want us to look in that direction as far as our attitude to violence goes.
But time and time again we read reports over the media of how much violence there is that is present in our society. The most common one is wife beating.
If you are a man reading this consider the following: our resort to violence comes about when we feel left out. When we no longer exercise power and authority over others. When we no longer exercise influence on others. When we submit a request and receive a negative reply to that request. Beneath that entire scenario we see the truth that says we need attention.
Men themselves have different definitions to offer regarding violence. Each one has his own ideas about the subject matter. In creative writing men tend to speak in favour of violence or against it, depending on the cultural traits of each writer. Ernest Hemingway’s Nick Adams series of short stories, for example, seems to favour violence for very much cultural reasons as opposed to Henry David Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” for very much the same cultural reasons. Yet both writers are Americans by nationality.
Albert Camus treats violence almost in the same vein as Ernest Hemingway, but his would be an ethno-Euro-centric one in favour of Western imperialism imposed on the East or the Orient. But this is one writer who does not leave violence as just that. Violence has many facets to it, he would argue in the novel “The Outsider”, the sort that has men eliminating men for cultural reasons but refraining from the use of violence when it comes to women. Women in Albert Camus’ world are regarded as partners through whom the philosophy of existentialism can best be fulfilled. If you are young and robust so be it; that can be good for your female companion. But if you are 30 plus and still have no offspring, drop everything and walk away. You won’t be of use to anyone, least of all to yourself.
And then Camus offers employment opportunities for those men who are 30 plus but who have no offspring and are still looking for jobs. In his book “The Myth of Sisyphus” he dishes out jobs to men as follows: start rolling a 50 tonne boulder uphill until you have it securely placed on top of the hill. If you cannot succeed the first time, keep doing it. That is your moment of usefulness to yourself and to others. Of course, our man there does not succeed with the boulder, but the positive aspect of that is the look of determination we see on his face when he trudges back downhill in heavy steps after the rock slid from his grip and is now at rest at the bottom of the hill. He will get down there and start rolling the boulder uphill again. He will never give up. He will continue doing that until the gods themselves become jealous.
Thus, Camus’ advice to men and their attitude to women. If your female colleague walks out on you, it could be that she is better loved by another. Accept that as truth. Truth liberates. And you need not resort to violence to ask her back.
Beneath that what Camus is getting at is that violence is best dealt with when we start looking at ourselves. We subject ourselves to some severe self cross-examination. How much do we love? What are our female colleague’s needs and wants? Are we able to answer these? Can she, above all, allow us to answer these needs and wants? In modern times women have progressed so much it would be improper if we regarded ourselves as the sole providers of this and that.
Now storyboard has been looking around for the best poem or story that could help address the problem of violence in our country, particularly that against women. Creative literature on this subject matter abounds, but to date storyboard can only recall those written by women and very little by men themselves. It would be nice if the men started looking at this subject matter seriously through creative writing. Writing, we must not forget, is free of charge. But it is the most powerful tool to use when it comes to the call of changing our society where we feel it is going wrong. It is time now for the men to start asking: Why is there so much violence in our country today? How best can we remedy that bad luck? And who else can but ourselves?
Recently it was noted that an entrant to The Crocodile Literary Prize, Bernard Sinai, had tackled the subject matter head on when he chose to write about a young bully in a PNG family setting. “The Taming of the Tiger” is the title of the story. That is a good start. What storyboard sees in that story is an allowance made for us to identify the crack in the wood of the life of our family bully. Once we see that crack we wedge in; and there you have it; the crack and the snap heard in the splitting of the wood can be at once resounding as the healing look we see on the face of our bully.
This article is written in appreciation of Keith Jackson’s PNG Attitude which promotes The Crocodile Literary Prize. Good on ya, fellas.
No comments:
Post a Comment